Creating materials for courses—syllabi, lesson plans, assignments—takes time. Generative AI tools aren’t just useful at broad, general prompts, but, as our colleagues have shown, they are useful in tackling the preparations before a student even arrives in the classroom:

• Preparing to teach: Starting a syllabus or a lesson plan from a blank page is daunting. AI can help you outline your course, create learning objectives, and suggest assignments or in-class activities, while making content that fits your course by feeding it specific reference materials.
• Assignments: Reusing the same assignments across multiple years can be time efficient, but it creates challenges for assessments. Some faculty have explored how AI tools can help write, modify, or create question sets. The more information you put in about the structure and concepts you want it to use, the better it will be. And it can even make a rubric for it.
• Course content: Classes often include large amounts of content for reading, from case studies to readings to slideshow text. Just a few sentences of a prompt using GenAI can generate summaries of relevant readings or videos you might want to include for students, brand new cases to discuss, and even what your slideshow for a lecture should include. Some faculty have gone a step further, inputting all the course materials in the materials that trained a teaching assistant chatbot. Hear what this faculty member learned from students’ interactions with this “faculty copilot.”

• Activity leader: Creating interactive classes is easy to advocate for, but hard to do. Some of our faculty have used GenAI to act like a peer student to stimulate critical thinking, perform real-time analysis of student responses to make them feel heard, or even help make games that align with class content,no coding needed!
• Personal tutor: You can’t be everywhere at once, but GenAI might be able to. Feeding it your syllabus, lectures, and an in-depth prompt can help make a personal tutorbot, generate unlimited practice problems, or even remind students of course-specific information.
• Custom reviewer: LLMs can be used to provide initial personalized feedback to your students, so you can focus on the big picture. Some faculty used them to quickly summarize student responses before office hours, or even point out areas in student responses that need improvement.
• Skill leveler: Classes often have hidden prerequisites: familiarity with coding, texts barred in foreign languages, or even art skills. GenAI tools can be leveraged creatively to help students overcome such barriers, like teaching a business school class about data analysis without requiring every MBA student to learn code, or analyzing trends of thousands of photographs without having to do so manually.

Since LLMs can write essays, respond to readings, and finish problem sets, how can one not be concerned about misuse? For you and your students, addressing this concern means first making sure we know what GenAI can and can’t do—then creating assessments that emphasize skills where AI tools fall short.

Here are some strategies faculty have found useful:

• Human-based learning: Design tasks and assessments that require creativity, practical application of concepts, and critical thinking. For example, instead of asking your students to summarize perspectives on a given issue, you may ask them to critically analyze which perspective is most convincing to them and explain why; to relate their answers to class discussions; or to assess their peers’ performance during a live problem-solving session.
• Process-based assessments: Another approach is to test intermediate steps in the learning process, instead of just the final product. (It’s easy to fudge your report card to your parents; it’s harder to fudge not having gone to school for the past two months.) Testing evidence of original thinking, planning, peer-to-peer conversations, etc. can make relying on genAI less attractive.
• Establishing norms: Emphasize original work and academic honesty, and at a minimum provide clear guidelines about the use of AI-generated content in assignments and assessments.

Here are the most important ones to keep in mind:

• AI models can make mistakes: We’ve all had an incident (or two!) where a GenAI tool seems to have lost its mind, yielding garbled or entirely made-up answers. These are called AI hallucinations. It’s tempting to think these will get eliminated over time as technology improves. But since LLMs are fundamentally probabilistic rather than deterministic, this may not be the case.
• AI models can be biased: AI adopts the biases of the material and data it was trained on. Good AI use involves being aware of, checking for, and making efforts to correct such biases.
• AI models can violate privacy: AI is very good at doing what you want, but it is also very bad at knowing if what you want it to do is allowed. Personal data is not supposed to be fed to GenAI models. Make sure you are aware of Harvard’s data protection policies and FERPA.
• AI models can be misused: Of course, AI could be used to plagiarize assignments. Unless you are interested in grading robots, you should shift the kind of assignments you are providing students (see above) as well as enforce academic dishonesty policies.

GenAI’s ability to meet learners where they are, both in terms of prior knowledge and learning progress, can increase students’ understanding, and AI-powered educational games can increase student motivation and engagement, particularly in STEM courses. One fascinating study showed that when students tutored by AI are pitted against students taught in the traditional classroom setting, the AI-tutored students performed as well or better.

It is natural for instructors, particularly successful ones, to wonder: GenAI may be useful for the average educator. But my classes are great; why would I need it?

One way to think about this is in terms of the efficiency benefits of GenAI tools—they can save time, facilitate meaningful non-classroom learning experiences, and make classroom discussions more interactive. For example:

• Utilize highly thoughtful prompt engineering with GenAI to build a tutorbot that gives students an unlimited number of interactive statistical problems.
• Challenge students with DIY interactive simulation games created on short order—and without any coding prerequisite!
• Empower students to experiment with visualizations of interactions with just a few minutes prompt engineering with DALL-E.

When using large language models (LLMs) in your classroom, it’s essential to be aware of the University’s Institutional Use of Generative and Agentic Artificial Intelligence: Privacy, Security, and Compliance, designed to ensure responsible and effective use of these technologies and to refer to School-specific policies and resources. It is also important to remember that other existing policies, such as Siena’s Acceptable Use Policy, Copyright Ownership Policy, Data Classification Policy, and Academic Integrity Policy, also apply to GenAI and the use of LLMs.

Across Siena, there’s a strong emphasis on using LLMs ethically and in ways that uphold academic integrity. The use of generative AI must align with the principles of honesty, respect, and responsibility, ensuring that students’ work remains original and reflective of their understanding and skills. In crafting a response to the use of LLMs in the classroom, it’s crucial to strike a balance between leveraging these tools for educational enhancement and ensuring that they do not compromise educational objectives.

At the course level, Siena allows for the customization of AI usage policies by individual instructors, provided these are clearly communicated. Each encourages innovative and thoughtful integration of AI in teaching and learning practices, including learning to use generative AI productively. Above all, students and faculty are encouraged to be transparent about the use of generative AI in academic work. This includes proper attribution when AI-generated content or assistance is utilized in the creation of academic materials. Consider co-creating course-specific norms around the use of generative AI with your students.

For any faculty who wish to simply explore the use of these tools, we encourage you to engage with peers and organizations at Siena that are interested in these topics.